To Contents Page To Previous Page To Next Page To Home PageNavigation Bar

ART GALLERY BOARD

FUNCTIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND STRUCTURE

The Board was established under subsection 4(1) of the Art Gallery Act 1939. A body corporate, the principal functions of the Board are to:

The organisational structure of the Board is:

SIGNIFICANT FEATURE

Land and buildings were revalued during the year resulting in a revaluation increment of $2.3 million.

AUDIT MANDATE AND COVERAGE

Audit Authority

Subsection 26(2) of the Art Gallery Act 1939 provides specifically for the Auditor-General to audit the accounts of the Board in respect of each financial year.

Scope of Audit

The audit program covered all major financial systems and was directed primarily towards obtaining sufficient evidence to enable an audit opinion to be formed with respect to the financial statements and internal controls established by the Board.

During 2001-02 specific areas of Audit attention included:

Audit Communications to Management

An audit management letter conveying the scope of the audit and related findings was forwarded to the Director, Art Gallery. A satisfactory response was received to the matters raised in that letter.

AUDIT FINDINGS AND COMMENTS

Commentary on General Financial Controls

The overall internal control environment was assessed as satisfactory.

CONTROLS OPINION

As required by subsection 36(1)(a)(iii) of the Public Finance and Audit Act 1987, the audit of the Art Gallery Board included an assessment of the controls exercised in relation to the receipt, expenditure and investment of money, the acquisition and disposal of property and the incurring of liabilities. The assessment also considered whether those controls were consistent with the prescribed elements of the Financial Management Framework as required by Treasurer’s Instruction 2 ‘Financial Management Policies’.

Audit formed the opinion that the controls exercised by the Art Gallery Board in relation to the receipt, expenditure and investment of money; the acquisition and disposal of property; and the incurring of liabilities were sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that the financial transactions of the organisation were conducted properly and in accordance with law.

INTERPRETATION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Statement of Financial Performance

Operating Result

The operating result for the year was a Surplus from Ordinary Activities of $3.7 million, compared with a surplus of $3.8 million in 2000-01.

Expenditure for the year increased by $1.2 million to $8.7 million.

Revenues from Ordinary Activities for the year totalled $12.4 million ($11.3 million). This includes grants from State Government of $6.2 million ($5.3 million).

Revenues from Ordinary Activities

Grants from the State Government represent 50 percent of Revenues from Ordinary Activities which supports the view that the Board is dependent on the ongoing financial support of the State Government as expressed in Note 2(o) to the Financial Statements. Bequests and donations represent 22 percent of Revenues from Ordinary Activities.

The following chart shows the major categories of Revenues from Ordinary Activities as a percentage of total revenues.

Revenues from Ordinary Activities by Category

Statement of Financial Position

Non-Current Assets
Property, Plant and Equipment

The written down value of property, plant and equipment increased by $1.9 million to $31.2 million. This increase is mainly attributable to the revaluation of land and buildings at 30 June 2002 which resulted in a revaluation increment of $2.3 million.

Heritage Collections

The Board was granted an exemption by the Treasurer from compliance with Accounting Policy Statement APS3 ‘Revaluation of Non-Current Assets’ which requires non-current assets to be revalued every three years. The heritage collections, which were due to be revalued as at 30 June 2001, will now be revalued as at 30 June 2003 (refer Note 2(g)).

The value of Heritage Collections increased by $5.8 million to $338.9 million. The valuation methodology applied to the Heritage Collection is explained in Note 2(g). The Board has accumulated these assets over a significant period of time primarily through the use of government funding, together with bequests and donations.

Liabilities - Payables

Payables at 30 June 2002 totalled $1.6 million of which $1.5 million relates to amounts owing for artworks purchased during the year.

To Contents Page To Previous Page To Next Page To Home PageNavigation Bar