GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION REFORM: INTRODUCTORY COMMENTS
INTRODUCTION
The 1997-98 year was marked by the implementation of major changes in the administrative arrangements of the Government of this State.
The change process which followed the election and appointment of the new government in October 1997 related, in the main, to the restructure of Ministerial and public sector agency responsibilities and arrangements.
OVERVIEW AND AIMS OF IMPLEMENTED CHANGES
In October 1997, the Government established ten Ministerial portfolios. These portfolios linked common areas of policy and services and formed larger and multifaceted portfolio based government agencies. In essence, each Ministerial portfolio comprised the portfolio Minister and the newly formed portfolio based department and other agencies (statutory authorities or other).
In relation to the newly formed portfolio based government departments, 8 such departments were created on 23 October 1998 concurrent with the abolition on that date of 25 government agencies. The central agencies of Premier and Cabinet and Treasury and Finance continued with limited change. The functions and activities of the abolished agencies were transferred to these 2 central agencies and the 8 newly created agencies.
In addition to the 10 portfolio Ministers (Cabinet Ministers), 5 further Ministers (Delegate Ministers) were appointed in December 1997. The role and responsibility of the Delegate Ministers is to assist certain of the portfolio Ministers with specific areas of their portfolio responsibility.
The aim of the changed government administrative arrangements is as follows:
AUDIT REVIEW
The nature and extent of the changes to Ministerial and public sector agency portfolio arrangements gave rise to certain important matters of accountability and control that required review in the discharge of the statutory audit responsibilities. These matters related to the following areas:
Regarding the second matter, this considered whether the role, responsibility and authority relationships, between the portfolio Ministers and Delegate Ministers, and the portfolio based Department Chief Executive and the Boards and Chief Executives of Statutory Authorities within the portfolio were clearly established and accountable.
The following three chapters of this Part of my Report present observations and comments arising from the review of the aforementioned areas. In brief the chapters relate to:
TOP